The criminal pharmaceutical drug industry was just recently given a gift by the federal court system (federal "Vaccine Court") that ruled that childhood vaccines do not cause autism in babies and small children.
Pharmaceutical companies and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services are back in the driver's seat to push harmful and toxic waste material into the American youth by way of syringe needle and under the guise of public safety.
Remember folks, I have been warning you for years now in how government screw you over and impair what little rights you have left - via "public safety" dogma and doctrine! They always talk about public safety in general and your personal safety in particular.
Public safety is such a monumental and effective word in today's society whereby the majority of U.S. citizens are scared beyond fright itself. The terrorist campaign (concocted by the government itself for its own agenda) has been a monumental success for the government. It has led to more control of the population.
Government scored a major hit by successfully pulling off the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center. Since this planned event, safety is the major concern for most Americans, and this means the American sheeple are about to really get their wool fleeced, and by those whom they blindly trust - their so-called public servants.
Back in February 2009, a special court ruled that vaccines did not cause autism.
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A special court ruled Thursday that evidence presented in three cases by parents of children with autism did not prove a link between autism and certain early childhood vaccines. The ruling came from a panel of "special masters" who began hearing three test cases in 2007 involving children with autism -- a disorder that their parents contend was triggered by the vaccine against measles, mumps and rubella combined with vaccines containing thimerosal, a preservative containing mercury. Three families -- the Cedillos, the Hazelhursts and the Snyders -- sought compensation from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, but the panel ruled that they had not presented sufficient evidence to prove that the childhood vaccines caused HYPERLINK "http://topics.cnn.com/topics/Autism"autism in their children.
Well, just because the plaintiffs may not have sufficiently proved their case in court doesn't mean that vaccines do not cause autism because I for one know they do. I've met too many people who've told me how they're child was fine and normal until the child was vaccinated.
I just received this injury 2 days ago:
"Hello, I am writing to you because of the concern I have about my son. He is 3 years old and does not speak. For the most part he will say "bye" and "mama." He just makes an "ah" sound when he communicates. He also does not follow directions unless we have to use force. He is not very social and plays by himself a lot unless he is with his sister. He likes to hit his head with his hand, he gets into these laughing spells at times, and just does not like to stay still for long. I made the big mistake of having him vaccinated thinking I was doing the right thing for him. We noticed changes in him after his 18-month to 2 year old shots."
I'm telling you, folks, it's the same ole same ole. Folks (parents) thinking they are doing the right thing and harming their children. But hey, ignorance of the law is no excuse. The law of Human Biology does not warrant inorganic and oxidic waste flowing through the body to protect the body against so-called viruses. God made no mistakes in the design of the human body and that's why we all have a defense system (immune system) and if you would just take care of your body and feed it the correct foods, that defense system will work just fine. You don't need any vaccines in your blood to do what God made your defense system to do.
I'm not mad at the pharmaceutical industry for their dangerous vaccines. That industry is diabolical and sinister and does what it does and I can respect their right to their position. After all, it does not force its waste matter products (drugs and vaccines) on people, well not directly, though it does use its financial might to heavily persuade the easily persuadable U.S. citizenry to consume drugs and take vaccination shots.
It is government, on the bidding of corporations, that attempt to force vaccinations on people. The pharmaceutical drug companies simply lobby this activity behind the curtains. Consider the following:
Vaccine promotion as a marketing gimmick
Drug companies, meanwhile, are seeking out new "markets" for promoting vaccines, including lobbying state legislators to pass mandatory vaccination laws, spreading fear about the Human Papilloma Virus to promote HPV vaccines, and urging parents to get their babies vaccinated for an ever-increasing number of health concerns -- including diarrhea. Intelligent, well-informed parents are increasingly asking, "Do our babies really need so many injections?"
The vaccination model of medicine is based on medical mythology promoted by Big Pharma-affiliate health authorities who do not believe the human immune system is able to adequately protect the body without chemical intervention. Vaccine believers -- which include most HYPERLINK "http://www.naturalnews.com/doctors.html"doctors and health officials -- insist that the only way the human immune system can properly recognize a potentially dangerous invader (such as a virus) is to intervene by injecting the body with weakened viral elements combined with inflammatory chemicals designed to activate an artificial immune system response. This inflammatory response may be partially responsible for the increase in autism and other diseases following vaccinations. (Some children have died within hours after receiving vaccine injections.) Author Byron Richards recently authored a detailed article explaining this. This medical mythology goes to great lengths to discount the naturopathic view of human health, which says that the human immune system should be supported rather than chemically hijacked, and that when properly supported through healthy foods, nutrition and an absence of chemical toxins, the human immune system is a fantastically effective technology that accurately identifies invading viruses and protects the body with an appropriate immune system response. Allowing the human immune system to do its job also subjects it to stresses that allow an adaptive response to unfold -- a response that strengthens the immune system against future threats, significantly lowering the risk of infection in the future. Natural News
I have no problems with people choosing to be vaccinated under free will. If you believe in vaccinations, cool! But what I'm saying is this: if you don't believe in vaccinations, you ought to have the right and free will to reject them. After all, the 4th Amendment of the United States (Bill of Rights) states that people have a right to be 'secure' in their person. Vaccinations are clearly a constitutional issue predicated upon privacy rights, liberty rights, religious expression rights, and personal rights. Please remember this, folks, and start raising these constitutional issues (in town hall meetings, against school officials, against law enforcement that aid forced vaccinations, etc.) because the U.S. Constitution protects the people (citizens) against the government, so start exercising these rights, or lose them!
When government sets itself up as the ultimate judge of what's right and wrong for people, or what's health and what's unhealthy for people, it's a very dark day in a nation that was built upon enlightenment through the words of the Founding Fathers impressed upon them in part by the Native Americans (League of Nations) and Moors. I have to give credit where credit is due. The Founding Fathers were not naturally enlightened men. They had help that you don't hear about in official history books.
Check out what occurred in the State of Maryland:
"(Natural News) Following the State of Maryland's threats against parents who refuse to have their children vaccinated, children were herded into a Prince George County courthouse being guarded by armed personnel with attack dogs. Inside, the children were forcibly vaccinated, many against their will, under orders from the State Attorney General, various State Judges and the local School Board Director, all of whom illegally conspired to threaten parents with imprisonment if they did not submit their children to vaccinations.
The State of Maryland has now turned to Gestapo tactics to force its medical will upon the People, stripping parents of any right to decide how they wish to protect their own children from infectious disease. Health authorities there have already announced their intent to essentially kidnap parents and throw them in jail, removing them from their children for up to thirty days if they continue to refuse to have their children vaccinated. This will all be conducted at gunpoint, with armed personnel and attack dogs at the ready, making sure nobody steps out of line, and suppressing any attempt at public dissent against the Orwellian vaccination policies.
The entire campaign against these parents is blatantly illegal. There is no law in Maryland requiring the vaccination of children, thus parents who refuse to do so may not be legally charged with violating any law. Instead, Maryland health and school authorities are using Gestapo-like tactics, threatening to charge the parents with child truancy violations, criminalizing them for daring to protect their children from the dangerous chemicals found in vaccines (including thimerosal, a chemical additive containing a neurotoxic form of mercury).
Now how come these parents didn't sue the State of Maryland in a class action suit for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief in federal court (United States District Court) for violating their children's federal 4th Amendment constitutional rights? The 4th Amendment secures the right to be safe (secure) in one's person. Why didn't these parents sue and bring nationwide attention to this state government tyranny? When a State or commonwealth violates the U.S. Constitution, it can be sued in federal court. It can't be sued for money, but it can be sued for a declaratory judgment which is a court order stating the state action is unconstitutional. The State can also be sued for injunctive relief, which means the federal court can issue an order prohibiting the unconstitutional activity. How come nobody in Maryland did the above?
You see, this is what I'm talking about in how people generally are just too damn unenlightened, non-legally astute, and not proactive in asserting their rights. I never went to college, possess no degrees, never attended law school, or any other school, but I know American law! I know how to read and understand the U.S. Constitution! I know the Bill of Rights. I know what government can and cannot do according to the Constitution and federal statutory law. I know the laws of the State of California. I know how to type up lawsuits and other legal pleadings. I know court rules and procedure. I know the legal game because I taught myself. Law is a big tool in this country and it is used to deprive you of things and to harm you, well, if you are ignorant. Law in America crushes the hell out of poor people. In America, for law to work for you, you must have: (1) Knowledge of law, (2) Money. Yes, money! To file legal pleadings cost money!
Folks, knowledge is power and ignorance is damnable. You don't need any damn license or certificate to learn something on your own. Radio host and pharmaceutical drug assenter Tom Joyner wrote my words of health off simply because I am not certified. First of all, in the U.S., herbalists are not required to be certified or licensed! Secondly, certification does not denote "competence." Receiving a certificate for something only means you have been certified. It makes the statement of a declaration, a declaration that something has occurred. Competence is not involved. For example, take a birth certificate. Does a birth certificate mean your baby is competent or was born competent? How could it be competent when it just got here? Its little brain is not even developed to comprehend on the mundane realm of things.
Next, take a death certificate. Does a death certificate mean a person was competent at the time of death? Or, is the statement of a death certificate simply that death itself is competent? Clearly all of this doesn't make sense if you believe a certificate has to do with competence.
If Joyner believes herbalists are incompetent because they are not certified by government, why is that these incompetent herbalists are not responsible for killing a single human being per year, and these doctors that Joyner believe are competent, kill between 700,000 and 1 million people per year by way of iatrogenics, which means "physician/hospital induced death"?
A birth certificate only declares that a new soul was born, that a birth occurred. A death certificate only denotes that a soul left, that death of the person took place. That's it! That's all it denotes!
You don't have to be an attorney to learn, know, and understand law. People didn't hire attorneys back in the 1770s. The average citizen knew the law and their rights. Attorneys existed, but the nation was not inundated with them.
Americans have been conditioned to believe that the law belongs to an attorney and without an attorney you're screwed in court, which is not true if you become legally astute. In fact, you can gain the upper hand on an attorney because attorneys or lawyers are very limited in their legal practice. They'll either practice family law, civil law, criminal law, commercial law, probate law, or some other kind of law. But you can study all departments of law and become legally powerful due to your knowledge. Lawyers don't study the Constitution in depth. These people only learn statutory law and in all honesty, they learn from the research of paralegals. That's who really does all the work while the lawyers make all the money. All lawyers do is go to court and speak on folks' behalf, speaking legalese to a judge and another attorney.
I'm not indicting all attorneys as useless. All I'm saying is that you can't think it is not your duty as a citizen to learn the law of the land and your rights. It is your individual responsibility to learn, know, and enforce your rights and the laws that secure them.
In the Maryland forced vaccination occurrence, there were so many constitutional issues that could have been raised. Maryland violated certain parents' 1st Amendment right (Religious Freedom clause, 5th Amendment right (Right not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law), and 14th Amendment right (Right not to be deprived of liberty without due process).
It was the children's 4th Amendment right that was violated and the parent's 14th Amendment right that was violated. This is very important to know! Parents can't sue in court for violation of their 4th Amendment right because their 'person' was not violated. It was their child's 4th Amendment right (in addition to other amendments where applicable) that were violated, not their own as they were not vaccinated in their person (skin) as their child(ren) were.
We are fast approaching the day on a mundane level whereby government will tell us "Shut up and do as we say - we know what's best for you more than you do!"
Sorry folks, but you know what? I agree with Deepak Chopra and Dr. Wayne Dyer in that we have the government and leaders we. We do! We allow this tyranny because most Americans are just plain ignorant when it comes to knowing their rights (Bill of Rights, state constitutionally secured rights) and the laws of the land. Generally speaking, all we care about in the United States is the illusion of money which appears to evade most of us no matter how hard we try to make and/or keep it. After money, all we care about is paying the bills, and after that, pursuing entertainment, an escape for most people.
Like I inferred above, we trust attorneys too much when it comes to law, in my opinion. We reserve law in this land for attorneys. Most Americans don't even believe you can contest a case or even start one without an attorney.
As a people and citizenry, we are dumber, legal-wise, than the people who lived here some 200-230 years ago during the formation of this nation.
We must climb out of our national abyss of ignorance and pursue enlightenment, independent thinking, wholistic intelligence, personal sovereignty, and even plain ole common sense, which have been abandoned by many people, if not most people.
If you think childhood vaccinations don't or can't injure your child, ask yourself why does the government have a Childhood Vaccine Injury Act?
This Act exists because children do in fact get injured from vaccines. But despite this fact, Big Pharma is instructed its pawns in government to turn to "Gunpoint medical practices."
Reflect on the following, please:
The desperation of organized medicine is becoming increasingly apparent
As more and more parents are becoming informed about the dangers of vaccinations and their link to autism, state health authorities are increasingly turning to "Gunpoint Medicine" to force the People to submit to the poisons of conventional medicine. Parents who attempt to save their children from deadly chemotherapy chemicals are being arrested and having their children kidnapped by Child Protective Services (see http://www.NaturalNews.com/Abraham_C... ), and oncologists who used to be armed only with radiation machines and chemotherapy injectors and now arming themselves with U.S. Marshals and other local law enforcement authorities who are using loaded firearms to enforce "the will of the State" against parents who resist.
Even the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) announced its strong opposition to the Maryland "Gunpoint Medicine" vaccination campaign. In a press release published Nov. 16, the AAPS states:
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons today condemned the "vaccine roundup" executed in Prince George's county Maryland this week, and promised to do everything it can to support parents who refuse to immunize their children.
"This power play obliterates informed consent and parental rights," said Kathryn Serkes, director of policy for the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), one of the few national physician groups that refuse corporate funding from pharmaceutical companies.
Government and Big Pharma can only get away with Gunpoint medical practices if 'We the People' remain dumb. Don't be mad at me for using the word 'dumb.' I can prove in no matter of time how successfully dumb downed Americans in general have become since 1970, thanks to fast food, junk food, music, media, video games, and cable television.
However, I remain optimistic at all the people waking up to consciousness and truth and trust that the human spirit will triumph over the energy of those ones in positions of power that seeks to rob, suppress, and restrict it.
In conclusion, beware the new childhood vaccine agenda!
Thank you for reading!
This article is compliments of Dherbs.com and Djehuty Ma'at-Ra.
Additional articles by Djehuty available @ www.dherbs.com/articles/
