Dherbs Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 06:19:34 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the new and improved Dherbs Forums!
20558 Posts in 5808 Topics by 1955 Members
Latest Member: adminRob
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Dherbs Forums
|-+  Law & Legal Issues
| |-+  Law & Legal
| | |-+  How do you control unfair judges?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: How do you control unfair judges?  (Read 538 times)
ANY2007
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


View Profile
« on: April 07, 2011, 07:46:00 AM »

I live in NY and I have been reading about unfair judges who don't seem to care about what the law states and sides with the cop or the prosecution to convict you. A friend of mine in NYC got two tickets for tint and the company that makes the tint meter states that to get an accurate reading the cop must clean the window and also the machine must be serviced for both night & day situations. The cop agreed to have not cleaned the windows so shouldn't that have made the cops evidence not credible? The cop had no recollection of the events and only read from a script.

" “The petition is granted and the summons is dismissed. Pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law (“VTL”) § 240(b) and 19 Rules of the City of New York (“RCNY”) § 39-08(e) “[n]o charge may be established except upon proof by substantial evidence

How was his evidence any substantial? I would appreciate some feedback from all of you on this matter. Can we sue the cop and the judge in civil court? The cop for not doing his job correctly and inconveniencing us which includes loss of pay from work, travel time tc The judge for unequal treatment under the law? If so how would we proceed.

Thank You

Logged
spielz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 166


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2011, 10:36:38 PM »

It's simple you must not have asked for relief. (Always use the law)

Your honor, based on the officer testimony he used tint meter X31 the equipment was not tested according to the manufacture instruction and according to civil rule of procedure section 2365 this tint meter in question was not properly admitted into evidence as such and  as a matter of law this evidence should not be allowed. The officer also testified he has no recollection of the event. So before this court the officer offers  no evidence of any violation, I motion this action be dismissed.
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to: