Dherbs Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 12:35:22 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the new and improved Dherbs Forums!
20558 Posts in 5808 Topics by 1955 Members
Latest Member: adminRob
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Dherbs Forums
|-+  Open Forum
| |-+  Sports & Trivia
| | |-+  Black Athletes Under Siege?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Black Athletes Under Siege?  (Read 333 times)
knix20
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1181



View Profile WWW
« on: August 22, 2010, 02:37:11 PM »

NCAA Pushes to Restrict Player Rights: Black Athletes Under Siege?
By Dr. Boyce Watkins, PhD
http://www.bvonsports.com/2010/08/21/ncaa-pushes-to-restrict-player-rights-black-athletes-under-sie/


Mark Emmert, the new president of the NCAA, plans to endorse a system for collegiate athletics that disallows players to play one year and head to the NBA. Instead, Emmert wants a system in which the age limit is removed (which is what kept players like Carmelo Anthony from going pro right out of high school) with players being forced to decide whether they wish to declare for the NBA draft or go to college. If they choose to go to college, they are not allowed to play in the NBA for either three years or when they turn 21, whichever comes first. In the face of the new rule, players are pushed to make the decision sooner, and are locked into that decision for at least three years.

Bethlehem Schoals and Tom Ziller of Fanhouse.com write on the racial dimension of this issue in the following way:

Of course, the age minimum has been a monumental failure (even according to no less an authority than U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan, who called the rule a "farce" in January). The rule saves NBA owners (almost exclusively white millionaires and billionaires) a few bucks at the expense of 18-year-olds (almost exclusively low- or middle-income blacks), who then have to navigate the extremely dirty water that is American college basketball recruitment or the possibly more perilous journey to Europe.

Some, including NCAA President Mark Emmert, might argue that the NCAA's recommendation forces athletes to pursue academic achievement instead of being distracted by sports. The problem is that by being a college athlete, you are already distracted by the massive wealth produced by college athletics. The only difference is that the players and their families are not getting the money, which is instead being funneled to the coaches and administrators who continue to keep athletes from having the same rights that the rest of us have as Americans. So, not only are athletes consistently hampered with the distraction of becoming multi-billion dollar field mules for those who are keeping all the money, they are additionally distracted by all of the financial problems in their homes that can't be solved while they remain in poverty.

The NCAA recently signed a $10.8 billion deal just for the rights to air March Madness. In fact, the NCAA earns as much or more money than most professional sports leagues. What makes this the greatest hustle in America is the fact that the NCAA, unlike other professional leagues, doesn't have to pay its employees a fair or living wage.

Black athletes and African American families are the ones who bear the greatest burden from the system of collegiate athletics. A select few successful black athletes are marketed all over our television sets, and many young black men become tempted to throw away their academic futures for a one in a million shot to become the next Michael Jordan. Most of them fall short and end up as uneducated pawns in a world that only wants to see them incarcerated or dead. The arrest of NBA star Antoine Walker, and the suicide of former NBA player Melvin Turpin are just two of the horror stories to come out of the persistently tragic relationship between the black male in America and the deceptive lottery ticket of professional sports.

How about this idea Dr. Emmert: Perhaps we can let athletes have the right to make their own decision? Given that Dr. Emmert and his colleagues are given labor market liberties that allow them to choose jobs, switch jobs and stay for as long or as short of a period as they wish, perhaps they might consider that athletes would like to have the same options.
Logged

What are you waiting for?!!? Join the Closed Lids Community Forum- http://bit.ly/bgg5ju and interact! See you there Smiley

www.closedlids.com
www.twitter.com/closedlids
www.facebook.com/ClosedLids
www.lmariedreams.blogspot.com
knix20
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1181



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2010, 02:55:32 PM »

I am on the fence on this topic.

I can see why black people would feel that these age limits are direct at black athletes. At the same time, I feel that college athletics is not a babysitting service. A lot of the players get recruited to top colleges and leave the team after a year to go in the NBA. Now the college athletic program is left to dry and pretty much was a babysitter for the athlete that entire year. I would like to know the success rate of athletes  enter the pros after high school or a year of college? Are they successful? To they get playing time? Or do they get dropped to the D league? Normally, from what I have seen,  players who continue at least 3 plus years in college, tend to be successful, especially those who have NCAA Finals experience.

However on the flip side. I do think that they should combine both rules. Have players get drafted out of high school or play at least 2-3 years of college ball. If you think about it how many players in the NBA actually got drafted out of high school. In post 1990s maybe less than 50, off the top of my head-kobe, garnett, kwame brown, dwight,lebron, josh smith, bynum, curry, mcgrady.  You have to be an extreme player for that to happen. So that rule, doesn't really effect anyone.

I do understand that people think having the players stay longer in school increase the financial burden at home, but a high percentage of these players have scholarships anyway. Athletic scholarships, especially a good one, you will have everything paid for (of course you are a slave to the school) My sister has a full scholarship to play sports. She does not pay for a thing. She even out of her monthly stipend gets enough that she has ALOT of extra money a month. Now if you are a basketball athlete who has a average to excellent scholarship package, (especially mens sports) you should have enough money that you can send back home if you are struggling. If you have everything paid for at school(books, tuition, room, food, travel, tutors,etc) you dont really need that extra money. But i am sure those players arent being sensible and they spend that money on video games, alcohol and more.

I can see both sides to the argument, but I think it might be beneficial to stay a little longer in college, plus it is a great wayt o get a free education so that after you leave the league you can make use of the degree. Not only do you get a free degree, the players also havea  chance to build a camaraderie that differs from the one they would have in the NBA. Another benefit, they get to receive more basketball training, which will help in the long run while in the NBA.

Logged

What are you waiting for?!!? Join the Closed Lids Community Forum- http://bit.ly/bgg5ju and interact! See you there Smiley

www.closedlids.com
www.twitter.com/closedlids
www.facebook.com/ClosedLids
www.lmariedreams.blogspot.com
360 overstand
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2010, 04:42:36 PM »

to me this is just about school ego. If you go to a college for three years. And you turn out to be an excellent player, then the college can take the credit.

I kind of agree abour finals experience. Take the Michigan State team with Chris Webber, Jalen rose n them. They all turned out to be great players.
Logged

Minister8-Ball
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 770


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2010, 05:58:59 PM »

It's a charade. There's no such thing as amateurism in college sports. The NCAA has always served as a free farm system for the NBA and NFL. Now with this new loophole of cats going overseas out of high school before coming to the NBA, that will serve to shift power back into the hands of the players. Some may discover they have a more lucrative career overseas than in the NBA.

I think if the NCAA wants to "control" this, then they will have to begin sharing a piece of the pie with its gladiators. Players like Reggie Bush have made it clear: one way or another, I'm getting C.R.E.A.M. by any means necessary.

The NCAA doesn't care if it's gladiators graduate or not. All it wants is to expand the brands of its schools. How much did Texas make from Vince Young? He brought them two Rose Bowl MVP's and a national title. Yet, he never got a dime from his college jersey. Did Carmelo Anthony get paid for bringing Syracuse a national title while he was there? Yet, the school and NIKE continue to make residual income from his jersey.

My message to the brothers: get your piece of the pie. You deserve it...
Logged
knix20
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1181



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2010, 03:58:12 PM »

Overseas is very lucrative for players. The make money, dont have taxes taken out, get a nice package(home, car). And they have fame that they wouldnt have achieved here in the US. Well, in the eyes of a college, the student is getting paid with the stipend, the network, scholarship, and free education. Do any athletes (pro/collegiate) make money off their jersey?
Logged

What are you waiting for?!!? Join the Closed Lids Community Forum- http://bit.ly/bgg5ju and interact! See you there Smiley

www.closedlids.com
www.twitter.com/closedlids
www.facebook.com/ClosedLids
www.lmariedreams.blogspot.com
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to: