|
spielz
|
 |
« on: February 11, 2010, 10:44:39 AM » |
|
Toxic Police, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BEN BATEMAN, Officer; et al., Defendants - Appellees. No. 05-56921
D.C. No. CV-03-02508-R(AN) MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 5, 2007** Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging, inter alia, that defendants lacked probable cause for arresting him. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, Haynie v. County of Los Angeles, 339 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir. 2003), we affirm.
For the reasons set forth by the magistrate judge in his November 9, 2005 report, adopted in full by the district court in its November 30, 2005 order, we agree that Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether any of his constitutional rights were violated when he was stopped, arrested, and detained by Glendale police. Plaintiff remaining contentions lack merit.
Looks like they take there time getting to appeals. I looked over appeal sample from Traffic manual 3. double check case law and replaced statutes.
|