Hotep family! Check out the article below that was sent to me. Please pass it on.
“The United States Africa Command (USAFRICOM or AFRICOM) is a Unified Combatant Command of the United States Department of Defense that is responsible for U.S. military operations in and military relations with 53 African nations - an area of responsibility covering all of Africa except Egypt. Africa Command was established October 1, 2007 as a temporary sub-unified command of U.S. European Command, but became fully autonomous and operational on October 1, 2008, when it officially took command of U.S. military operations within the aforementioned area of responsibility.”
When did the USA find a need to become a “fully autonomous” combatant entity in EVERY COUNTRY IN AFRICA (except Egypt)? And, if Egypt would have allowed it, it would be included in this domination as well.
Well, Barak Obama is now the President of the United States of America. And finally we have the answer as to why there was so much media attention given to this past election. Ralph Epperson authored a book entitled, “The Unseen Hand,” and in this book he exposes one of the most effective tactics that the government uses when they want to create and implement something that they know the people would not agree with. This tactic is called “distraction.” Well, the not only were the people in Amerikkka distracted; the entire world was distracted by the past election circus. So many thousands of our people are still rejoicing over what they think they did by getting out there and voting.
This was truly the greatest distraction of all time.
(By the way, NSCM/46 was signed into law under Presidential Executive Order in March 1978. It was written by Zbigniew Brezinski, who was the National Security Advisor at that time, and is PRESENTLY Barak Obama’s chief advisor.)
Notice some of the wording of NSCM/46…
“The objective of our policy toward Black Africa is to prevent social upheavals which could radically change the political situation throughout the area. The success or failure of our policy in the region depends on the solution international and internal issues whose importance of the United States is on the increase.
II. A. U.S. INTERESTS IN BLACK AFRICA
A multiplicity of interests influences the U.S. attitude toward black Africa. The most important of these interests can be summarized as follows:
1. POLITICAL
If black African states assume attitudes hostile to the U.S. national interest, our policy toward the white regimes; which is a key element in our relations with the black states, may be subjected by the latter to great pressure for fundamental change. Thus the West may face a real danger of being deprived of access to the enormous raw material resources of southern Africa which are viral for our defense needs as well as losing control over the Cape sea routes by which approximately 65% of Middle Eastern oil is supplied to Western Europe.
2. ECONOMIC
Black Africa is increasingly becoming an outlet for U.S. exports and investment. The mineral resources of the area continue to be of great value for the normal functioning of industry in the United States and allied countries. In 1977, U.S. direct investment in black Africa totaled about $1.8 billion and exports $2.2 billion. New prospect of substantial profits would continue to develop in the countries concerned.
Internationally, damage could be done to the United States by coordinated activity of African states designed to condemn U.S. policy toward South Africa, and initiate discussions on the U.S. racial issue at the United Nations where the African representation constitutes a powerful bloc with about one third of all the votes.
3. Political options
In the context of long-term strategy, the United States can not afford a radical change in the fundamentals of its African policy, which is designed for maximum protection of national security. In the present case, emphasis is laid on the importance of Black Africa for U.S. political, economic and military interests.
The FBI should mount surveillance operations against Black African representatives and collect sensitive information on those, especially at the U.N., who oppose U.S. policy toward South Africa. The information should include facts on their links with the leaders of the Black movement in the United States, thus making possible at least partial neutralization of the adverse effects of their activity.
B. THE RANGE OF POLICY OPTIONS
The concern for the future security of the United States makes necessary the range of policy options.
(h) to support the nomination at federal and local levels of loyal Black public figures to elective offices, to government agencies and the Court. This would promote the achievement of a twofold purpose: first, it would be easier to control the activity of loyal black representatives within existing institutions; second, the idea of an independent black political party now under discussion within black leadership circles would soon lose all support.
Now, remember, this NSCM was done in March of 1978 by the hand of the then National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brezinski. Is it any matter that this same person selected Barak Obama while he was a law student in college, groomed him, trained him, and is de facto his “daddy” in world affairs? What is so hard to see here?
Now, the Brezinski protégé (Barak Obama) is the Commander in Chief of AFRICOM. And in case it got pass you, AFRICOM is acronym of the U.S. military take over of the ENTIRE continent of Africa (except Egypt). But then again, the U.S. Census Bureau decided years ago that Egypt wasn’t in Africa anyway (it is now in the Middle East according to them).
How is it that something of this magnitude was not mentioned in any of Obama’s speeches…not a word. Maybe it’s because he knew that if he said one word about AFRICOM that Black people would have said, “Wait a minute here…what are you trying to do man? Get us to vote you in so that you can be the one who carries out the Global 2000 program to eliminate 75% of the world’s non-white population?” (See NSCM/200)
Well, my people THAT’S exactly what has been done. And the most insulting part of it all is that the people who own Barak Obama (i.e., The Rothchilds, Oppenheimers, Schiffs, and other members of The Crown) have appointed chocolate-colored men (i.e., Barak Obama & General William “Kip” Ward, et al.) to carry this out. In this way, the Black people of the world (who don’t know better) cannot cry, “GENOCIDE AND RACISM.”
And of course, Secretary of State Hillary is the white “monitor” to make sure that the “negroes” do as they are told. (Just like back in the days when the slave oppressors would allow Black to gather for religious services; they couldn’t meet without a “monitor” to make sure that the negroes were behaving.) Just read her address before the Senate Committee and see how she outlined “Obama’s Africa Policy” at
http://www.africom.mil/getArticle.asp?art=2493&.
To those Black people who so eagerly praised and supported the program to elect Obama, I have to congratulate you for your commitment and support to the agenda of the system that owns Obama. I am happy that you are happy. You have done exactly what the powers that be wanted you to do. I know that you didn’t mean any harm. Just the idea of “a Black man” becoming the President of the United States made you stop thinking just long enough for them to implement their program with little or no resistance from the very people who are the children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren of Africa.
Hegemony is “the dominance of one social group over another, such that the ruling group (i.e., AFRICOM) or hegemon acquires some degree of consent from the subordinate (i.e, Africa), as opposed to dominance purely by force. It is used broadly to mean any kind of dominance, and narrowly to refer to specifically cultural and non-military dominance, as opposed to the related notions of empire and suzerainty.
In international relations, a hegemon is a power that dictates the policies of all other powers in its vicinity, or one that is able to defeat any other power or combination of powers that it might be at war with.
Pertinent to the concept are the processes by which a dominant culture maintains its dominant position (i.e., the use of institutions to formalize power, the employment of a bureaucracy to make power seem abstract and, therefore, not attached to any one individual, the inculcation of the populace in the ideals of the hegemonic group through education, advertising, publication, etc., and the mobilization of a police force as well as military personnel to subdue opposition.”
Imagine that… a Black man with the mind of Zibigniew Brezinsky.
Author