Dherbs Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 22, 2012, 06:08:43 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the new and improved Dherbs Forums!
20743 Posts in 5873 Topics by 1955 Members
Latest Member: adminRob
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
+  Dherbs Forums
|-+  General Health
| |-+  Health
| | |-+  The Mystery of the White Blood Cells
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: The Mystery of the White Blood Cells  (Read 669 times)
GodSon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


The Law of Life is The Law of Belief!


View Profile WWW
« on: July 06, 2006, 07:53:19 PM »

The Mystery of the White Blood Cells


Many people that know me know I like to talk about the White Blood Cells and their role in the body. It's a favorite topic of mine because the idea that they are not what we have been led to believe intrigues me. Those little particles that float in and out of the blood and lymph have confused all of modern medicine into believing they are the "vigilant policemen of the vital domain". They are said to be phagocytes (germ eaters) and part of that defense system of the body that is misnamed the immune system. This was not always the belief however and for very good reasons were these ideas challenged when their initial proponent, Rudolph Virchow, sought to solve the mystery on whether the leukocytes (white blood corpuscles) are actually pus corpuscles. Corpuscles, by the way, means only bodies. The technical name for the white blood corpuscle is leukocyte while the technical name for the red blood corpuscle is haemocyte (from haem which contains iron and binds oxygen giving it the red appearance.

Over 150 years ago, there was a great debate on whether these leukocytes were actually pus corpuscles and it was Virchow, the pre-eminent physiologist of his day who rose to the challenge to settle the dispute. Here are his words, as recorded and transcribed in Cellular Pathology (a collection of lectures Prof. Virchow gave to settle these disputes):

Quote
Under all circumstances this layer resembles pus in appearance, and since, as we have already seen, the colourless blood-cells individually are constituted like pus-corpuscles, you see that we are liable not only in the case of a healthy person to take colourless blood-cells for pus-corpuscles, but still more so in pathological conditions when the blood or other parts are full of these elements. You can imagine how apt the question is to present itself, which has already been seriously raised by Addison and Zimmermann, whether pus-corpuscles are not merely extravasated colourless blood-cells, or vice versa, whether the colourless blood-cells found within the vessels are not pus-corpuscles which have been admitted into them from the exterior. We are here called upon for the first time to make the practical application of the principles which I laid down with regard to the specific nature and heterology of elements (p. 92). A pus-corpuscle can be distinguished from a colourless blood-cell by nothing else than its mode of origin. If you do not know whence it has come, you cannot say what it is; you may conceive the greatest doubt as to whether you are to regard a body of the kind as a pus or a colourless blood-corpuscle. In every case of the sort the points to be considered are, where the body belongs to, and where its home is. If this prove to be external to the blood, you may safely conclude that it is pus; but if this is not the case, you have to do with blood-cells.

That's the criterior which changed the course of medicine till this very day! Virchow acknowledges in Cellular Pathology that the white blood corpuscle and the pus corpuscle are the same in every way and even tells of various experiments showing how.

It was Mechnikov who advanced the phagocyte theory and actually won the Nobel Prize for it. This was in early 1900's but even during his Nobel Prize lecture, he acknowledged all the great opposition to his ideas.

This error has proven tremendous for it covers up all of the various illinesses that people suffer and have been led to believe their own bodies are attacking themselves (auto-immune diseases i.e. lupus) when in reality the leukocytes are doing what they do, wreak havoc by releasing toxins into the body, cause inflammation, cause circulatory constipation, etc. etc.

In times of wellness the blood (of a meat eater) will contain about 1 leukocyte to every 200 or more red blood cells (much less in vegans) while in times of illness there can be as many as 1:20! In short term bases where the leukocytes are numerous it is called leukocytosis where on the long term basis, it is called leukemia which we know is a Cancer! When a woman has her menses and thick white substances comes out first they call that leukorreah because it's the pus/white blood corpuscles coming out as waste. When you eat cooked foods or meat, the body goes into what is called digestive leukocytosis where the leukocytes crowd the digestive system shortly after consuming these foods.

The reason that a meat eater has considerably more leukocytes than a vegan or one on a mucusless diet is because it is the foods that these particles come from, particularly the partially digested fibrious elements of the food that enters the circulation. It is this material, and it's parent serum albumin that bacteria propagate on. Bacteria are Nature's scavengers which gather the harmful elements of the blood and consume them. It is in the destruction of these pathogenic elements of the blood that releases histamine (hence runny noses, etc) and other toxins as it is being consumed by bacteria and both are destroyed - the bacteria from the toxins and the leukocytes from being eaten. It takes about 25 bacteria to consume the largest leukocytes. In reality the phagocytic theory needs to be flipped upside-down and inside-out to really get a picture of what's going on inside the body.

There is so much in this subject to cover so I'll call this Part One.
Logged

GodSon

LIVE WITH PASSION!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The J Christopher - http://www.TheJChristopher.com
My Official Site!
GodSon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


The Law of Life is The Law of Belief!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2006, 12:49:16 AM »

The Mystery of the White Blood Cells Part II
[/size]

As I wrote supra (Part I), there was a controversy on whether the leukocytes are in fact the same thing as pus cells. Prof. Virchow settled the controversy by erroneously stating they were in fact different things despite being exactly similar to each other in every way accept their "origin" in the body. Sometime thereafter it was settled reluctantly that they are the same. I would like to demonstrate from Dorland's Medical Dictionary that the leukocytes are in fact pus, mucus and waste material.
 
By definition the leukocytes are:

Quote
leukocyte (leu-ko-cyte) (loo'ko-sit) [leuko- + -cyte]  a colorless blood cell capable of ameboid movement; there are several different types, classified into the two large groups granular l's (basophils, eosinophils, and neutrophils) and nongranular l's (lymphocytes and monocytes). Called also white blood cell or corpuscle and white cell or corpuscle.


Note the names eosinophils and neutrophils denote the staining these leukocytes take during histological studies. The granular interior of some of the leukocytes speaks to the fact that they are globs of mucus that float around (engulf) waste products. The nongranulars are those that simply have not or can not engulf (by floating their sticky mass around) particles.Those that move do so only by a process called chemotaxis or chemical attraction and not true life as it appears to be. Consider the following picture of leukocytes (WBC) and red blood cells (RBC) and you tell me does these sticky, things look like true cells of the human body?



The pus cell is:
 
Quote
pus c.'s  polymorphonuclear leukocytes, chiefly neutrophils, occurring in pus.

 
Pus by definition is:
 
Quote
pus (pus) (pus) gen. pu'ris  pl. pu'ra, [L.]  a liquid inflammation product made up of leukocytes, cellular debris, and a thin protein-rich fluid called liquor puris.

 
Mucopus is:
 
Quote
mucopus (mu-co-pus) (mu'ko-pos") [muco- + pus]  mucus which has the appearance of pus on account of the presence of leukocytes.


Mucus is by definition:
 
Quote
mucus (mu-cus) (mu'kos) [L.]  the free slime of the mucous membranes, composed of secretion of the glands, along with various inorganic salts, desquamated cells, and leukocytes.

It is a known medical fact that the leukocytes are in fact the same thing as pus, mucopus, mucoid matter, and lymphocytes.



The above illustration shows the leukocytes (with platelets adhering to their sticky surface) forming atherosclerosis and thus circulatory constipation. This process causes the oncoming blood to pile up at the site, flow backwards somewhat and then slip out of the circulation into the interstitial spaces between the cells. That whole process causes inflammation.

The leukocytes are particles of decaying matter and their spontaneous death has been filmed. They have no structure and can have one nucleus, several nucleus or NO nucleus. The can have amoeboid movement or not. They can have granules or not. They can adhere to each other and form large cells (monocytes) and they give the deceptive appearance of devouring germs, when in actuality it is the germs devouring them. When they are not scene doing what they allegedly are there for, devouring germs, it is said that the person has an auto-immune disease or compromised immune system.

There you have it directly from Borland's Medical Dictionary! More to come in Part III
Logged

GodSon

LIVE WITH PASSION!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The J Christopher - http://www.TheJChristopher.com
My Official Site!
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to: