For the public record, I accept the so-called conspiratorial view of history as well
as of current events (history in the making), i.e. 9/11 World Trade Center terrorist
attacks, Oklahoma City Bombing, assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy,
Malcolm X and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to name a few.
You may ask why (do I accept the so-called conspiratorial view of history) and my answer
is simple: because I am a free, critical, and independent thinker and have done my own
personal and private research and studies into certain events whereby the official (or
government) version of events just didn't add up or make sense to me. That's why!
I am simply intelligent and am not one of the Boobus Americanus (foolish Americans) or
sheeple who foolishly take and trust the government's every word, especially the "official version"
of events that the U.S. government gives to the masses, i.e. the Warren Commission
Report, Report on 9/11, etc.
I have studied the subject (so-called conspiracy) for nearly 20 years and have spent
hundreds upon hundreds of hours studying and doing independent research, reading various
books, magazines, old newspapers; watching documentaries of VHS and DVD; listening to
audio cassette tapes and CDs, and attending lectures and discoursing with other
independent researchers and lecturers.
Because life in the Matrix is mostly political, I don't believe most political events
happen by chance, but are actually planned in advance (by those in positions of political
and economic power) and carried out as planned and instructed. In fact, it was my good
friend Jordan Maxwell who told me this some 16 years ago as I began to get real deep into
the study of revisionist history, mistakenly called conspiracy theory.
However, Jordan didn't make up this saying. He got it from a very well known and
respected American - former president Franklin D. Roosevelt who stated:
"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that
way." Franklin D. Roosevelt, U.S. President
Now do you think all these nay-sayers of so-called conspiracy would call President
Roosevelt a conspiracy nut or Looney case? I think not! He's too respected and was once the
leader of this nation. Certainly an American leader couldn't be a nut case! Could he?
But why do you think Roosevelt would dare say such? That was such a bold statement and
gives credence to so-called conspiracy theories, and the manner in which Roosevelt said
it was no theory, but sounded like actual knowledge. After all, the man was in the
position of Executive Officer of the United States. The man was privy to things
(information, intelligence) the average citizen was not. Think about it!
Also, before president Dwight David Eisenhower left the White House to give way to newly
elected president John F. Kennedy, Eisenhower warned the American people to beware of the
military industrial complex. Why the need for Eisenhower to publicly warn us about this
military industrial complex? What did he know about it? Was he delirious? Perhaps he was
a so-called "conspiracy" nut? I think not!
In many of my articles you read the word "Rulers" referring to the people who govern us
from behind the scenes, behind the curtains. Many people really believe that the "actors"
they see out in the public before us all are really the real leaders of the world -
people like the President of the United States, the British Prime Minister, the Pope of
Rome, etc.
These persons are actors, role players. They are put out front to fool the ignorant
masses. There's only one personage that I can think of now as I type this article that is
truly a Ruler and not an actor and that is the Queen of England. This woman is reported
to rule the planet and is the owner of the property called "United States" (which really is a corporation if you study the alternate history of this country) as well as its citizens ("U.S. citizens") as well as owning Great Britain and it's citizens. Scary, huh?
According to social-activist Dick Gregory (a prominent independent researcher himself), she also allegedly makes $360 million dollars in interests per day!
Before continuing, let us first look at this phrase "conspiracy theory" for purposes of
more understanding.
Conspiracy |kənˈspirəsē|. noun ( pl. -cies) a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful: a conspiracy to destroy the government. See note at plot . •the action of plotting or conspiring : they were cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. PHRASES: a conspiracy of silence an agreement to say
nothing about an issue that should be generally known. ORIGIN late Middle English : from
Anglo-Norman French conspiracie, alteration of Old French conspiration, based on Latin
conspirare 'agree, plot' (see conspire ).
Theory |ˈθēərē; ˈθi(ə)rē|. noun ( pl. -ries) a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, esp. one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained : Darwin's theory of evolution. • a set of principles on which the practice of an activity is based : a theory
of education | music theory. • an idea used to account for a situation or justify a course of action : my theory would be that the place has been seriously mismanaged. PHRASES: in theory used in describing what is supposed to happen or be possible, usually with the implication that it does not in fact happen : in theory, things can only get better; in practice, they may well become a lot worse. ORIGIN late 16th cent. (denoting a mental scheme of something to be done): via late Latin from Greek theōria
'contemplation, speculation,' from theōros 'spectator.'
When we put these two words "conspiracy" and "theory" together, we get: "speculation of a
secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful."
Speculation is not factual, so when we attach "conspiracy theory" to matters of a factual
nature and where the evidence is concretely factual and/or undisputed, in the minds of
the masses, the facts and evidence are simply based on speculation and thus cannot be
taken seriously and do not warrant serious time, energy, and attention into the matter.
This is the main reason so many sinister things keep happening and repeating themselves in our world,
especially assassinations of leaders, wars, suspicious deaths, recessions, etc.
Okay, moving on!
But am I alone in my view of who really runs the world? Actually, I'm in good company.
Consider the words of Mr. Benjamin Disraeli infra:
"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who
are not behind the scenes." - Benjamin Disraeli
Also,
"Elites, not masses, govern America." - Thomas R. Dye and L. Harmon Ziegler, Authors (The
Irony of Democracy)
A lot of people in the U.S. really think we are under a democratic form of government and
that the people (citizens) really run things through elected officials. Nothing could be further
from the truth.
Yes, we have a democracy here in the U.S., but it's not the kind of democracy many folks
have been led to believe. We don't have the kind of democracy that is government of the
people, by the people, and for the people. We have a democracy in the truest sense of the
word, the kind of democracy that the enlightened Founding Fathers knew about and warned
future generations of - to be on the lookout for.
Consider the true definition of the word "Democracy" that the United States government
once used:
Democracy: A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any for
of "direct" expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is
communistic-negating property rights.Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or
regard to consequences. Results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.
From: Training Manual No. 2000-25, U.S. WAR DEPARTMENT, Washington, November 30, 1928. Re: CITIZENSHIP. Prepared under the direction of the Chief of Staff. 
Understanding this correct definition of the word 'Democracy' above, I'd have to say that
we really do have a democracy because we are governed by mobsters (nicely or euphemistically called politicians).
And boy are we licensed damn near to death. We have to have a license (permission) damn near for everything - marriage license (permission to get married), driver's license (permission to travel), business license (permission to conduct business), real estate license (permission to sell property), seller's license or permit (permission to sell products or services), liquor license (permission to sell liquor), child care license
(license to care for children), etc.
In case you aren't knowing, the word "license" in legalese means "permission":
"License." n. 1.a Official or legal permission to do or own a specified thing. See Syns
at permission. b. Proof of permission granted, usu. In the form of a document, card,
plate, or tag. 2. Deviation from normal rules, practices, or methods. 3. Latitude of
action, esp. in behavior or speech. 4. Excessive freedom. - v. -censed, -cens·ing. 1. To
give permission to or for. See Syns at authorize. [< Lat. Licentia, permission <
licēre, be permitted.] The American heritage Dictionary (1994), 3rd edition, pg.
480, "License."
A license is basically a privilege and a privilege is usually granted by someone in power
or authority, i.e. a competent authority.
If the grantor of a privilege is the COMPETENT authority, then the receiver of the
granted privilege has to be the INCOMPTENT subject.
I thought as American citizens we had RIGHTS? You do know there's a distinct difference
between a right and a privilege (license), right? Rights are God-given and unalienable
and privileges are granted after being applied for.
If you have to apply for a thing, it's a privilege and not a right. Rights are not
applied for. You are born with them.
"You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or
restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe." John
Adams, 2nd President of the United States
But lets' get back to democracy. Let's read what the Founding Fathers of America and
other enlightened men of times past have said about the word "Democracy" that so many of us blindly
embrace and are proud to live under:
"The evils we experience flow from the excess of democracy. The people do not want (lack,
ed.) virtue; but are dupes of pretended patriots." Elbridge Gerry (delegate to the
Constitutional Convention)
"It has been observed that a pure democracy if it were practicable would be the most
perfect government. Experience has proved that no position is more false than this. The
ancient democracies in which the people themselves deliberated never possessed one good
feature of government. Their very character was tyranny; their figure deformity."
Alexander Hamilton (June 21, 1788)
"We are a Republican Government. Real liberty is never found in despotism or in the
extremes of democracy." Alexander Hamilton
"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been
incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been
as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." James Madison United
States President
"Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order
and chaos." John Marshall (1st U.S. Supreme Court Justice)
And what have non-Founding Fathers said about the word "Democracy"?
"I have long been convinced that institutions purely democratic must, sooner or later,
destroy liberty or civilization, or both." Thomas Bibington Macauley
"...no government had ever been, or ever can be, wherein timeservers and blockheads will
not be uppermost. As a result, he spoke of nations being .... drawn to the dregs of
democracy." Dryden (2 centuries before America was formed).
"Democracy is necessarily despotism." Immanuel Kant (1795)
"If you establish a democracy, you must in due time reap the fruits of a democracy. You
will in due season have great impatience of public burdens, combined in due season with
great increase of public expenditure. You will in due season have wars entered into from
passion and not from reason; and you will in due season submit to peace ignominiously
sought and ignominiously obtained, which will diminish your authority and perhaps
endanger your independence. You will in due season find your property less valuable, and
your freedom less complete. "Benjamin Disraeli (1850), British House of Commons.
"Democracies are prone to war, and war consumes them." W.H. Seward
"Democracy becomes a government of bullies tempered by editors." Ralph Waldo Emerson
"Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people, by the people, for the people."
Oscar Wilde
"The most popular man under a democracy is not the most democratic man, but the most
despotic man. The common folk delight in the exactions of such a man. They like him to
boss them. Their natural gait is the goosestep." H.L. Mencken
The symbol of the Democratic party - a Donkey (Jackass), is so ideal and perfect to
represent the political party most of the American masses identify with; after all, in
the word "masses" we have the word "asses" and that's exactly what most American citizens
are: a bunch of dumb asses! And the proof is in the pudding. Look at how their rights dwindle and they do nothing about it.
How can you allow recent government leaders to use the word "democracy" when the United
States Constitution never once mentions the word "democracy" but clearly mentions
"republic"?
The U.S. Constitution in Article 4, section 4 clearly mentions the word "republic." Read
the Constitution yourself and see it for yourself. Your brain won't start aching.
Even with reciting the pledge of allegiance, we say "... and to the Republic, for which it
stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
No where does the Pledge of Allegiance mention anything about a democracy.
But, in 2010, we have a democracy and love it. And a damn legislative democracy at that!
One governed by maritime-admiralty statutory law.
But what is a republic, especially since so many enlightened individuals contrasted it
with a democracy? Let's check it out:
Republic: Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials
best fitted to represent them. Attitude toward property is respect for laws and
individual rights and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the admission
of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard
to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought
within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results
in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress. Is the "standard
form" of government throughout the world. 
A republic is a form of government under a constitution which provides for the election
of (1) an executive and (2) a legislative body, who working together in a representative
capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation, all power to raise
revenue and appropriate expenditures and are required to create (3) a judiciary to pass
upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize (4) certain
inherent individual rights. Take away any one or more of these four elements and you are
drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to these four elements and you are drifting into
democracy.
121. SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHERS. - Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its
authority cannot be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered.
Democracy is the "direct" rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without
success. Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both
autocracy and democracy***and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a
republic. SOURCE: TM 2000-25 (120-121) - CITIZENSHIP
Okay, I think I've successfully proven that there's a big difference between a Republic
and a Democracy, and per chance, that we were duped out of a lawful Republican form of
government so as to be enslaved under a Democratic form of government that resulted in
nearly every aspect of our lives being governed via license. How we got duped into a
Democracy and out of a Republic is actually documented. Simply learn about the difference
between "U.S." and "U.S.A." and you'll discover what happened after the Civil War (and
actually what the Civil War was really fought for) and what the Congressional Buck Act of
1940 was really about. I hate to say it, but we've been seriously bamboozled.
You may ask yourself, "how come most people won't accept the so-called conspiratorial
view of history" even after hearing or reading about it? I think author Gary Allen
answers the question best:
"Most people are highly reluctant to admit that they have been conned or have shown poor
judgment. To inspect the evidence of the existence of a conspiracy guiding our political
destiny from behind the scenes would force many of these people to repudiate a lifetime
of accumulated opinions. It takes a person with strong character indeed to face the facts
and admit he has been wrong even if it was because he was uninformed." Gary Allen,
Author, "None Dare Call It Conspiracy", pg. 9, (1971) Concord Press, Seal Beach, CA
You see - most Americans are just uninformed, on top of being ignorant. However, most are
also highly opinionated. Ego (negative ego) blocks us from accepting the truth and social status takes
precedent over intellectual honesty:
"Unfortunately, for many people social status comes before intellectual honesty. Although
they would never admit it, social position is more important to many people than is the
survival of freedom in America." Gary Allen, Author, "None Dare Call It Conspiracy", pg.
15 (1971) Concord Press, Seal Beach, CA
This too mentioned above is also a big part of the reason we are so enslaved here in the
U.S. We have so many inner demons (blocks) that we can't even begin to checkmate
government. Because we are so defective, flawed, and imbalanced on so many levels,
especially emotionally, mentally, and spiritually, most of us are too dependent on
government to ever break free of it, it's grip on our very lives.
It's funny to me how former president Bill Clinton openly rejects so-called conspiracy,
especially the New World Order, but was an admirer and protégé of professor Carroll
Quigley, a highly noted scholar who boldly admits to a conspiracy (that guides our
political destiny):
"I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and
was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret
records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life,
been close to it and many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and
recently, to a few of its policies ... but in general my chief difference of opinion is
that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant to be
known." "Tragedy & Hope", pg. 8, - Professor Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University
Professor Quigley revealed many undeniable facts in his book "Tragedy and Hope",
especially pertaining to how we all would be controlled by the mark of the beast: NUMBERS,
specifically, the Social Security Number:
"... his [the individual's] freedom and choice will be controlled within very narrow
alternatives by the fact that he will be numbered from birth and followed, as a number,
through his educational training, his required military or other public service, his tax
contributions, his health and medical requirements, and his final retirement and death
benefits." Professor Carroll Quigley (Georgetown Univ.), Author of "Tragedy & Hope."
We are all tracked by numbers: from the Social Security Number, to the Tax Identification
Number and Driver's License number! Numbers control our mundane existence here in the
Matrix. I'm not saying this is good or bad, I'm just sayin'!
The number thing starts when our parent(s) apply for a Social Security Number. That's
when the game (or slavery) really starts for us. Not with the birth certificate because
the birth certificate assigns us no number, but the Social Security card does.
Our lives are controlled with numbers that connect us to them (the numbers), e.g. driver's license
number, Social Security Number, Tax Identification Number, Employer Identification
Number, Vehicle Registration Number, Vehicle Identification Number, and a host of other
numbers, e.g. telephone numbers, cell phone number(s), cable television PIN (for
pay-per-view events), banking PIN, Internet PIN, etc.
This is not even a conspiracy, just a fact of life here in the Matrix!
Okay, moving on!
Back in the late 1990s before Thunderbolt Books in Santa Monica was named Thunderbolt and
was actually called Deep River Books, one day while perusing some titles in the
conspiracy section of the bookstore, I bumped into two well known celebrities who were
also in the conspiracy section of the bookstore: actors David Duchovny (of "The X-Files")
and Gary Shandling ("The Gary Shandling Show"). My life is so interesting because I'm like a magnet for attracting celebrities. Astrology reveals how Taurus people are magnets for celebrities. Malcolm X too was a Taurus (May 19) and also was a magnet for celebrities: Alex Haley, Sam Cooke, Etta James, Gordon Parks, Jr., James Baldwin, Ossie Davis, Ruby Dee, Dick Gregory, et al.
Okay, slight excursion, but returning to the point of bumping into Duchovny and Shandling.
David had a copy of a particular David Icke book in his hand. I asked David what was he doing in
this section of the bookstore and he smirkishly smiled at me and said "Where do you think
we get the ideas for X-Files from?" He was evidently looking for more X-Files plots for his television show.
Producers in Hollywood also read the conspiratorial view of history and current events
and many movies with this particular theme have been made, i.e. "Conspiracy Theory", "Wag
the Dog", "American Bacon", "Down On Us (also known as "Beyond the Doors"), "Echoes of
Murder", "JFK", and "Capricorn One."
Some of my favorite revisionist historians or so-called conspiracy advocates are Mae
Brussell, Dick Gregory, John Judge, Jim Marrs, Anthony Summer, Jim Keith, Alex
Constantine, Jordan Maxwell, William Still, Steve Cokely, and Ralph Epperson to name a
few.
Jordan Maxwell told me nearly 2 years ago via e-mail that it is over for Americans. I asked why
and he simply mentioned 9/11, that we allowed 9/11 to take away our civil liberties (what
ones we had left) and worst of all, introduce the Patriot Act.
Like other key terms and phrases used to make us voluntarily relinquish our rights, i.e.
"public safety", the words "terrorism" and especially "patriotism" have greatly done us
in, and the trip thing about this is, we were warned about the dangers of patriotism by a
very well known historical figure - JULIUS CAESAR, who stated the following:
"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a
patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the
blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch,
and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in
seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded
by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I
know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar." Julius Ceasar, Emperor of Rome.
Clearly, George W. Bush must have studied Julius Caesar, or, in the alternative (because
Bush Jr. was such an idiot or came off as one on purpose), his puppeteers must have studied Julius Caesar because Bush banged the drum of war [with the Iraqi war] and whipped the majority of unenlightened
U.S. citizens into a patriotic fervor using the manufactured fear resulting from a
concocted terrorism (that only exists in the mind) and amazingly got the majority of U.S.
citizens to voluntarily relinquish their constitutionally secured rights and accept the
government's Patriot Act which no government official (Senator or Congressman/woman) read
in full before signing. Bush Jr. was our modern day Julius Caesar.
In closing here in Part 1 of this article, I shall leave you with the words of journalist Pat Shannan:
"The only people in the world, it seems, who believe in the conspiracy theory of history
are those of us who have studied it." - Pat Shannan, Journalist-at-Large, MEDIA BYPASS
Trust me, most people who condemn so-called conspiracy theory of history have not even
studied the perspective. They are either too lazy or too dumb, or worse, both! And then
you wonder about freedom, how as a collective citizenry we lost it? Well, ole Thomas
Jefferson said it best:
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what
never was and never will be." Thomas Jefferson (1816)
Ponder over the words of ole Ben Franklin:
"A nation of well-informed men who have been taught to know and prize the right which God
has given them cannot be enslaved. It is in the realm of ignorance that tyranny begins."
Benjamin Franklin
The biggest problem for U.S. citizens that I see is that they too easily accept authority
as truth rather than the truth as authority, and in my opinion this is what greatly helps
to enslave and keep them enslaved:
"They will find it difficult, those who have accepted the authority as truth, rather than
the truth as authority." - Gerald Massey, Egyptologist and Author
I think it greatly befitting to close out this article with a quote from the Queen of
so-called conspiracy herself, Mae Brusell:
"Our lives are being manipulated by specific individuals who can be identified and
exposed. Conspiracy theories only remain "theories" when there is no court, no
lawyer, no judge, no Congress, with the courage to expose the evidence. In every case
where the evidence is pursued, the "theory" becomes a clear-cut case of criminal
conspiracy." - Mae Brusell
Truly, the conspiratorial view of history and current events is usually the accurate one.
The END of Part 1!
Thank you for reading!
This article is compliments of Dherbs.com. |
